Wednesday May 14, 2025
  • Venezuela
  • Mexico
  • Colombia
  • Chile
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Podcast
Versión Español
PanAm Post
  • Home
  • Regions
    • South America
    • North America
    • Central America
    • Caribbean
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Authors
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Regions
    • South America
    • North America
    • Central America
    • Caribbean
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Authors
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
PanAm Post
No Result
View All Result

Home » US Airlines: Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Foreign Competition?

US Airlines: Who’s Afraid of the Big Bad Foreign Competition?

Nick Zaiac by Nick Zaiac
April 9, 2014
in Economics, Editor's Pick
FacebookTwitterTelegramWhatsapp

The 1978 airline deregulation was one of the greatest free market reforms in more than a generation. Few people today can even fathom the degree of control the federal Civil Aeronautics Board had over the airline industry: routes were set in stone; fares were mandated; and competition did not exist.

Justice Stephen Breyer had this to say about the deregulation of the airlines:

RelatedArticles

Why are some diamond brands so expensive?

Why are some diamond brands so expensive?

January 23, 2024
When the Economic Terrorists at the WEF Felt Terror of Their Own

When the Economic Terrorists at the WEF Felt Terror of Their Own

January 20, 2024

What does the industry’s history tell us? Was this effort worthwhile?… No one foresaw the industry’s spectacular growth, with the number of air passengers increasing from 207.5 million in 1974 to 721.1 million last year.… [And] fares have come down.… In 1974 the cheapest round-trip New York-Los Angeles flight (in inflation-adjusted dollars) that regulators would allow: $1,442. Today one can fly that same route for $268. That is why the number of travelers has gone way up.

But we knew all of that already. What is seldom acknowledged is that the initial deregulation, while major, was incomplete. There are clear places where airline regulation remains, to the detriment of fliers nationwide.

One of these is the prohibition on foreign-owned airlines flying between domestic airports, or “cabotage” as it is known. Kenneth Button looks at this in a new study published in Regulation. Allowing cabotage would open the door for low-cost airlines — such as Ireland’s Ryanair, the United Kingdom’s easyJet, and others — to enter the domestic market and compete with lower fares.

Source: Ryanair
Source: Ryanair.

This rule is the airline equivalent of the more famous Jones Act of 1920, which, among other things, banned cabotage among US ports for non-US ships. In both cases, as Button notes, the rationale is defense — the ability for the military to commandeer civilian vehicles in the event of a war.

On its face this argument seems absurd. Can you imagine any realistic scenario where the largest military in the world has to not only seize civilian planes, and where foreign ownership of the planes makes any difference?

The fact is that when foreign airlines are banned from domestic routes, it is consumers who lose out. The barrier to foreign, low-cost airlines not only keeps prices artificially high, it decreases the overall capacity of the system. Given that the United States is full of airports that primarily operate government-subsidized flights, foreign carriers could take advantage of the vast amounts of unused capacity for their own commercial operations.

All of this comes at effectively no cost to taxpayers or the flying public. Ending cabotage restrictions makes almost too much sense.

Tags: airlinesderegulationprotectionismunited states
Nick Zaiac

Nick Zaiac

Nick Zaiac is a public-policy researcher in Washington, DC. He also serves as a policy analyst at the Maryland Public Policy Institute. His column, The DC Leviathan focuses on the often-ignored bureaucratic agencies, from the Department of the Interior to the General Services Administration. He has been published in the Baltimore Sun, City AM, CapX, and other outlets. Follow @NickZaiac.

Related Posts

Why are some diamond brands so expensive?
Analysis

Why are some diamond brands so expensive?

January 23, 2024
When the Economic Terrorists at the WEF Felt Terror of Their Own
Argentina

When the Economic Terrorists at the WEF Felt Terror of Their Own

January 20, 2024
China Plans to Launch ‘Crypto-Yuan’ to Bolster Communist Regime’s Control
Asia

China Plans to Launch ‘Crypto-Yuan’ to Bolster Communist Regime’s Control

January 15, 2021
Purchase of Damaged Dollar Bills Is the Latest Unusual Business in Venezuela
Venezuela

Purchase of Damaged Dollar Bills Is the Latest Unusual Business in Venezuela

January 14, 2021
Why the Real Villain of 2020 Was Big Government
Coronavirus

Why the Real Villain of 2020 Was Big Government

January 9, 2021
Diosdado Cabello Sidelined in Chavista National Assembly
International Relations

OPEC Reaches Production Agreement Without Lowering Guard Due to New COVID-19 Wave

January 6, 2021
Next Post
Vice President Joe Biden Visits Mexico to Discuss Economic Relationship

Argentina Accuses IMF of Ideological Bias after Report Forecasts Downturn

Subscribe free and never miss another breaking story

  • Venezuela
  • Mexico
  • Colombia
  • Chile
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Podcast

© 2024 PanAm Post - Design & Develop by NEW DREAM GLOBAL CORP. - Privacy policy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Regions
    • South America
    • North America
    • Central America
    • Caribbean
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Authors
  • Contact

© 2024 PanAm Post - Design & Develop by NEW DREAM GLOBAL CORP. - Privacy policy

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Privacy and Cookie Policy.