Spanish.- The “milk” produced by so-called trans women (biological males who identify as female) is “comparable to that produced [by biological women] after childbirth,” according to a study published by NHS Trust, a trust affiliated with the National Health Service (NHS) and operating in England and Wales.
Despite the analyses lasting only five months and concerns about potential long-term harm to newborns, this new delusion was disseminated to push and blur the boundaries with human biology in the insistence of trans activism to promote what they call “inclusion.” This group has also previously been the first to use the term “chestfeeding” as a replacement for “breastfeeding” in Britain to “avoid discrimination.”
- Read next: The “New Soros” funds progressive agenda in the US with “dark money”
- Read next: Was this the worst Super Bowl show ever? Usher’s lazy performance joined by great featurings
All of this only reinforces how the woke movement is not only advancing in the United States but also in other countries where the specific qualities of each gender are being disregarded in favor of an ideology. At this particular point, it was necessary to administer different hormones to men so they could produce the secretion that, according to NHS Trust, is “milk” similar to that produced by a woman.
No to “mothers”, yes to “people who give birth”
To understand the experiment, it must be noted that these biological men took progestin, a hormone that helps develop milk-producing glands. They also needed a lactation medication, such as domperidone, which, according to The Telegraph, is often prescribed to women who have difficulty breastfeeding to help stimulate prolactin production.
The Telegraph clarifies that domperidone was not intended for this purpose, but doctors prescribe it without authorization, “even though the manufacturer, Janssen, advises against it due to potential side effects on the baby’s heart.” However, this trust indicates that its consumption is “safe” and that men taking it should seek advice.
Criticism is swift for the transgression that this experiment represents, which was also not conducted long-term, so its effects on babies beyond the five-month observation period are unknown. For example, a mother produces milk with certain characteristics depending on the timing of the baby’s birth. That is, it contains “more fats and secretory immunoglobulins, which protect the baby until their immune system develops,” says a message echoed by Lottie Moore, spokesperson for the independent organization, Policy Exchange.
Look at this picture, here a mothers milk visibly changed overnight to meet the demands of her baby who was unwell at the time
Those signals are communicated to the mother by saliva from her baby, the mother may even be unaware of her baby’s health status yet levels of white… pic.twitter.com/WJDPcqRecU
— Science girl (@gunsnrosesgirl3) September 19, 2023
Just as in the United States or Spain, the United Kingdom is also experiencing a wave of pressure from activists seeking to impose an agenda in all areas: education, sports, and medicine. In August 2022, another NHS trust (there are approximately 217 trusts supervised by this institution) published messages on social media using terms such as “people who give birth” and “people with uterine cervixes” to replace the words “mother” or “woman.”
The same is happening in the US, where boundaries have become more blurred thanks to the push from the Department of Defense and the White House under the Biden administration. Nonetheless, different states with Republican governors have issued regulations governing issues such as gender transition in minors without parental consent or limiting the participation of biological men in women’s sports. These guidelines do not seem to occur in the same way in European territory for now.