Tuesday August 9, 2022
  • Venezuela
  • Mexico
  • Colombia
  • Chile
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Podcast
Versión Español
PanAm Post
  • Home
  • Regions
    • South America
    • North America
    • Central America
    • Caribbean
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Authors
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Regions
    • South America
    • North America
    • Central America
    • Caribbean
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Authors
  • Contact
No Result
View All Result
PanAm Post
No Result
View All Result

Home » Aerolíneas Argentinas Hides behind Nationalist Folly

Aerolíneas Argentinas Hides behind Nationalist Folly

Contributor by Contributor
July 28, 2015
in Economics
0
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
FacebookTwitterTelegramWhatsapp

EspañolBy Gonzalo Macera

Over the last few months, Argentina has celebrated some of its most important national holidays: May Revolution (May 25), Flag Day (June 20), and Independence Day (July 9). These days of remembrance strengthen what many call the national identity.

RelatedArticles

China Plans to Launch ‘Crypto-Yuan’ to Bolster Communist Regime’s Control

China Plans to Launch ‘Crypto-Yuan’ to Bolster Communist Regime’s Control

January 15, 2021
Purchase of Damaged Dollar Bills Is the Latest Unusual Business in Venezuela

Purchase of Damaged Dollar Bills Is the Latest Unusual Business in Venezuela

January 14, 2021

Beyond these celebrations, which politicians have aptly hijacked in recent times, for some years now the Kirchner administration has been trying to give a new meaning to ideas like “sovereignty,” “what is ours,” and “homeland.”

Desde que fue estatizada, Aerolíneas Argentinas solo le ha producido pérdidas al país. (Hispaviacion.es)
Since Argentina nationalized the airline, it has only incurred in losses for taxpayers. (Hispaviacion.es)

This was precisely the government’s rhetoric some years ago when it nationalized the country’s iconic airline, Aerolíneas Argentinas, with a de-facto monopoly on domestic flights. To date, it has set quite a few records in operational failures, and not a single accomplishment in efficiency.

The firm’s spokesmen keep blaming the crisis on the prior private administration, while lauding the government takeover, but they never mention the airline’s huge net losses nor its questionable productivity.

Historically, the Argentinean government has funded infrastructure works and utilities firms regardless of costs, under the guise of “national integration.”

But I wonder, is this the way to achieve the purported goals?

If the airline’s ultimate objective is to connect different parts of the country at reasonable prices for Argentineans, keeping afloat an entire firm that has extremely expensive operational costs — and only generates losses — does not seem to be the most efficient policy.

British Airways has on average 142 employees per aircraft; Aerolíneas Argentinas keeps around 188 people on the payroll per airplane. A low-cost company such as the European RyanAir is even more efficient: it operates on less than a quarter of the budget of standard airlines, and employs only 32 staff per aircraft.

In light of these statistics, it is indisputable that a more appropriate policy would be to open up the domestic routes to competition and let any airline interested in, particularly low-cost firms.

The state could even subsidize low-traffic routes that are not profitable, but that it wishes to keep operational for strategic reasons, and pay low-cost firms to serve them. A little imagination would bring further efficiency gain, perhaps through the use of a varied fleet and smaller aircrafts.

This would allow routes the government wants to keep open to remain available, and competition would substantially reduce air fares. Without going too far afield, Panama authorized new airlines such as low-cost VivaColombia and saw rates fall by up to 75 percent.

It’s a simple equation. More competitors, among them the super-efficient low-cost airlines, push prices down. This benefits existing clients and encourages more Argentineans to travel by plane.

Since the return to state ownership, Aerolíneas Argentinas has tried by any means — formal and informal — to maintain control over local routes. Had its dispute with LAN over hangars at the Metropolitan Airport of Buenos Aires prospered, the Chilean company would have been unable to operate in the country at all.

If, on the other hand, the market were open for competition, not only would the overall quality of flights improve, but also their timing and safety, and many more people might opt for air transportation. This used to be beyond the reach of common Argentineans, compared with land transportation, which actually has a much higher rate of accidents.

At this point, one can hardly defend — even if the underlying goals are misguided — the inefficiency or the cost that taxpayers have to bear for a company that loses up to US$2 million a day. We could enjoy a thriving aviation market if only we were to allow competition and perhaps subsidize a few routes, with the presence of airlines whose core strategy is to minimize costs per flight.

More and more grandiose nationalist promises that lack substance will lead us nowhere. The government’s highly questionable public policies rather promote heated emotions that border on xenophobia.

We could also go one step further and dare to question that perhaps nations are not bound by their territories, which are ultimately historical accidents, but instead by a common culture and a sense of belonging among peoples.

Gonzalo Macera is an Argentinean economist, university professor, consultant, and businessman. He writes about economic and political issues for several outlets, and is a collaborator with Fundación Bases. Follow him @zalo_mac.

Tags: Aerolíneas ArgentinasArgentina
Previous Post

Fabricating Genocide to Bring Down Ríos Montt

Next Post

Why States Echo the Feds with 50 Shades of Policy Failure

Contributor

Contributor

Related Posts

China Plans to Launch ‘Crypto-Yuan’ to Bolster Communist Regime’s Control
Asia

China Plans to Launch ‘Crypto-Yuan’ to Bolster Communist Regime’s Control

January 15, 2021
Purchase of Damaged Dollar Bills Is the Latest Unusual Business in Venezuela
Venezuela

Purchase of Damaged Dollar Bills Is the Latest Unusual Business in Venezuela

January 14, 2021
Why the Real Villain of 2020 Was Big Government
Coronavirus

Why the Real Villain of 2020 Was Big Government

January 9, 2021
Diosdado Cabello Sidelined in Chavista National Assembly
International Relations

OPEC Reaches Production Agreement Without Lowering Guard Due to New COVID-19 Wave

January 6, 2021
No OPEC Consensus, Oil Production Uncertain
News

No OPEC Consensus, Oil Production Uncertain

January 5, 2021
Why Most Fell for the Lockdowns, While a Few Stood for Liberty
Analysis

Why Most Fell for the Lockdowns, While a Few Stood for Liberty

January 5, 2021
Next Post
San Francisco residents wait in line at the quintessential US bureaucracy: the Department of Motor Vehicles. (Gabriel White)

Why States Echo the Feds with 50 Shades of Policy Failure

Subscribe free and never miss another breaking story

  • Venezuela
  • Mexico
  • Colombia
  • Chile
  • Brazil
  • Argentina
  • Podcast

© 2020 PanAm Post - Design & Develop by NEW DREAM GLOBAL CORP. - Privacy policy

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Regions
    • South America
    • North America
    • Central America
    • Caribbean
  • Politics
  • Economics
  • Opinion
  • Podcast
  • Authors
  • Contact

© 2020 PanAm Post - Design & Develop by NEW DREAM GLOBAL CORP. - Privacy policy

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it. Privacy and Cookie Policy.